Good thriller with great acting

“1408”
Starring: John Cusack, Samuel L Jackson, Mary McCormack
3 stars out of 4


Too many horror films these days fall flat on there face, usually in the first 30 minutes, due to lack of story, acting, or directing. With “1408” director Mikael Hafstrom creates a film with tension, scares, and exceptional acting from its leading man. Based of a Stephen King short story, the film revolves around haunted house guru, and supernatural writer Mike Enslin. As research for his latest book, Enslin is determined to check out the notorious room 1408 in a New York City hotel by personally staying as a guest in the fabled room.

When Mike Enslin's (John Cusack ) daughter died , he became obsessed with the paranormal , particularly the ' other side '. After years of being a paranormal writer & investigator, he has found - nothing. Mike is ready to give up his search for evidence of the paranormal. Until he hears of a possible subject for his new book - Room 1408 in the Dolphin Hotel, New York City. Mike is determined to prove that the rumors surrounding the room are fakes by staying in the room himself. He cannot be dissuaded by anyone , even the hotel manager Mr. Olin ( Samuel L Jackson ) , tries to warn him off , but Mike is having none of it. That is until Room 1408 shows him its true colors ... and its many horrors

The film is shifty and creative in the ways of horrifying Enslin, the scares are totally surprising, as well as what ends up happening. Most of the film takes places in the room, making the viewer feel claustrophobic like Enslin, who also becomes disoriented when he starts seeing visions of his dead daughter. Cusack is what makes this film; he is so believable in this role that he really makes the script come alive, and the audiences believe. Most of the characters are minor, as Jackson playing the manager, and Mary McCormack as Enslin’s wife.

This is really good for a PG-13 thriller, the script was smart, without being to over the top, while the acting was also good. If your looking for an under the radar summer film, check out “1408” and enjoy the ride.

Apatow strikes gold again

“Knocked Up”
Starring: Seth Rogen, Katherine Heigl, Paul Rudd, Leslie Mann
3.5 stars out of 4


Director-Writer Judd Apatow is now on the short list of comedic genius’s working today in Hollywood. Apatow’s debut film “The 40 year old Virgin” provided audiences last summer with many laughs, while the film also received great reviews for its originality and substance. This time around Apatow centers his film on a one night stand gone completely wrong, the effect is a stoner and a career driven women coming together to make it work, and figuring out things about themselves in this brilliant comedy that is even funnier the 2nd time around.

Seth Rogen, plays Ben Stone, a stoner who lives with 4 of his buddies who are all working on a website devoted to movie stars and there specific nude scenes in the movies they appear in. Ben is not your usual hunk, hes overweight, jobless, but sometimes charming. Katherine Heigl plays Alison Scott, who is rising in the ranks of her job on the E! Channel. When Alison is out celebrating her promotion with her older sister Debbie, she encounters Ben; they dance, drink, and wind up back at her place when Ben’s miscommunication leads him to not using a condom and conceiving his future child.

The next day Alison realizes how drunk she actually was and feels disgusted for having sex with this naked man snoring in her bed. Ben offers to take here to breakfast, where they make short conversation, and that is the last that they see each other. 8 weeks later, Alison finds herself throwing up and realizes she is pregnant with Ben’s child. The film is smart in making us appreciate and like these characters right from the start, that we immediately find that whatever happens will be hilarious.

Another key aspect of the film is how Alison accepts Ben for not his looks, but as a man trying his best to support her at times, and be interested in all the pre-baby shopping/activities. Its fun to see Alison taking a liking into this comedic genius played by Seth Rogen, who is ultimately climbing the ladder with every role, he plays. Rogen and his buddies make the film; they are up to date on all pop culture, which is key in making fun of each other, among other things. Also the film is very up to date with the modern world, “Spiderman 3” is mentioned 3 times, also Alison sister insists on her kids goggling everything. While the film will draw heavy comparisons to “The 40 year old Virgin” for its disgusting jokes, crude humor, and foul language, I must say that both films are huge successes when its comes to Apatow’s talent for comedy and relationships.

Paul Rudd, who plays Debbie’s wife Pete, is also very funny; he plays the sarcastic bored husband to a tee. Rudd is a hidden gem among working actors, he recently said in an Entertainment Weekly article that he likes to be under the radar, and not that popular, Rudd has appeared in such films like “Clueless”, “Anchorman”, and “The 40 year old Virgin.” It’s only appropriate that I dedicate a whole paragraph to this man, because he and his wife Debbie, played by Leslie Mann propel this comedy further along with the rest of the cast. It’s amazing how charming and downright hilarious this film allows itself to be. Some of the humor is hard to recognize, because the script talks about other movies and people that some people may not pick up on, but Apatow is clearly in the know of what makes audiences laugh for 2 hrs and 15 minutes.

Apatow also balances the film to actually make it good, other than just funny and amusing, Heigl brings freshness to young female actors, while the rest of Apatow’s cast is just running throw the motions in making this film great. I cant say enough about the chemistry of the cast, and the classic dialogue, trips to Vegas, sex scenes, and busting a man at a fantasy baseball draft have never been funnier. Kudos to Apatow, keep up the good work.

Russell's performance propels "Waitress"

"Waitress"
Starring: Keri Russell, Nathan Fillon, Jeremy Sisto
3 stars out of 4

Any restaurant movie usually uses the jokes and crude mannerisms of the servers and kitchen staff to amuse the audience. "Waitress", is in a whole other league. This is a small film, coming from director Adrienne Shelly, who died before her fine film got released.

Most of the film takes place in Joe's Pie Diner, a small little miracle of a place that boasts a fine pie menu, and an even pie maker. Keri Russell plays Jenna, a depressed 30 something who escapes her daily miseries by dreaming of new and creative pies to make, these scenes are always refreshing. Russell is an absolute wonder in this tiny film, her husband Earl played by the sometimes underated Jeremy Sisto is controlling and unaware of Jenna's depression, and need to run away to escape her un-satisfying life.

Jenna soon realizes she is pregnant, "It must have been that one night Earl got me drunk", she says. She is un-easy about her demanding boss Kal finding out, that only her close friends know. Her friends Dawn and Betty have there own male problems themselves. Betty is cheating on her husband, and Betty is dating a man that makes up poems for her on the spot, there relationship stemmed from a 5 minute date.

Jenna's prenancy is un-wanted, but she tells her new doctor she will keep it. The charming Nathon Fillon plays Dr.Pomatter, new in town, Pommatter takes an immediate liking in Jenna. They began an affair which leads to weekly checkups, and sneaking around, these scenes are played out comically, rather than dramatically, which helps the story. I cant forget to mention Andy Griffiths role as diner owner Joe, a fiesty old-timer who wants his meals prepared to perfection. He also gives comedic insight into Jenna's overstuffed life. Both characters are important to eachother, leading to a surprise later in the film.

"Waitress" worked for me in several cases, the acting by Keri Russell is phenominal, much of the dialogue and situations are humorous on a certain respectable and southern level, also the film is unique with its basic plot, and charming characters. While I had a hard time loving the film, I respected it for its originality and charm. Its really a solid film that will grow from word of mouth, this a was little suprise I didn't see coming. Keri Russell's role is proff that this girl can act, if this movie came out later in the year, I feel her performance could be nomination worthy.

Ocean's 13 delivers on style and cleverness

“Oceans 13”
Starring: George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Al Pacino
3 stars out of 4


The whole gang is back in Steven Soderburgh’s third heist installment. This time around the gang is interested in revenge, not money. When one of there guys Rueben (Elliot Gould) is muscled out of his share on an up and coming Casino run by Willie Bank (Pacino) the boys decide they will get back at him by ruining his grand opening which will inevitably close the casino.

Oceans 11 was a solid caper film, one of the best, Oceans 12 was another thing, pretty much an inside joke between the director and the cast, the audience at times was left out on many of the jokes. Soderburgh his tightened some ends up and has gotten back to the feel and style of Oceans 11. This film is fun, very entertaining, and great to look at, as the heist moves back to Vegas.

Its fun to see Al Pacino back and looking great as he plays the villain, Willie Bank is fixated on establishing great casinos and earning the prestigious 5 diamond award which honors the best casino/hotel. While Bank could have been more menacing of a villain, he is still upstaged and confused when the shit hits the fans, also we believe him as this semi-villain, I liked the performance.

While Rueben is hospitalized and glued to a bed, the gang tries to devise a way to rig all of the major table games to sabotage Bank’s grand opening. Not only that, but they are funded by there arch nemesis Terry Benedict (Garcia) who also wants them to steal diamonds from Bank’s previous 5 diamond award.

While all of this is going on, the audience is thrown back into the Vegas style and scheme, the cast is brilliant, and seeing the crew go through all of there resources to make this caper happen is absolutely genius. The writing is better this time, and the audience is rewarded. Many characters from 11, and 12 are back which makes it all the more fun. There is also a funny subplot involving David Paymers character, the 5 diamond judge who Bank is hoping will award him the prize once again, his is put through hell, as the crew make sure his experience at the casino is terrible.

Lets get to Clooney, Pitt, and Damon, all stylish as ever, proving these movies will never feel boring and dull to them, sure Soderburgh cut out a lot of the jokes, and antics of 12, but we still love this crew talking about the heist. Much of the originality of 11 is back, making the characters enjoyable. The film has a lot of twists, which I will not spoil, all I can say is that Oceans 13 surpasses the rest of the summer sequels so far, and Soderburgh has created a fine heist trilogy with excellent actors, settings, dialogue, and wit.

28 weeks is easily a great summer sequel

"28 Weeks Later"

Starring: Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner, Mackintosh Muggleton, Imogen Potts, Harold Perrineau.

3 and a half stars out of 4

Danny Boyle had more than revived the Zombie horror flick in "28 days later", now with a similar plot and wider scop, Spanish director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo not only makes a good sequel, but fills the screen with devastating images that keep the audience involved throughout.

28 weeks after the previous installment, Britain has hopes of maintaining itself in hopes of re-populating itself, and get back to normal living. This film is shown through the eyes of many people, a father (Carlyle) and his 2 kids ,(Muggleton and Potts) the US military mostly portrayed by a sniper and pilot, played by Jeremy Renner from Swat and Harold Perrineau from Lost. The film populates itself with enough scares, and viscious intensity that is hard to turn away from. The editing and camera work may come as annoying for some, but it just adds to the confusion and overall madness of the film. A few plot points lead to a another breakout which causes even more disruption this time around, as a code red is issued and eventually EVERYONE must be killed.

The film takes several views and mixes them exceptionally well, the task of an emotionally struggling family, and the views and scenarios of the highly skeptical US military and there involvement on this issue. Each film, has underlying political tones, which make them even the more smarter and intelligent. While not a lot of dialogue, the audience is always entranced in this violent, and unbelieveable situation that extends beyond danger.

The cast is drenched in blood, and thats all that we know off them, the family has a past that the audience knows about, but other than that, most of the characters are who we are when we meet them, and that is fine. Robert Carlyle is disturning as the caring father, turned uber-zombie hunting down his kids, Jeremy Renner is the sniper with a heart, who acknowledges his task of helping the kids whose blood may be special in creating a vaccine for the rage virus. Most of the situatuons are creative, making way for fresh ideas in a sequel many saw pointless before its release. With excellent pacing, a gripping soundtrack, and many suprises, "28 Weeks Later" proves special, and equal to its predecessor.

3.21 Greatest Hits

LOST

Lost: Season 3

Episode 21

Flashback: Charlie Pace

Plot:"Greatest Hits" was the 21st episode of Season 3, and was originally broadcast on May 16, 2007. When Desmond has another one of his flashes, Charlie is forced to come to terms with the notion that he may have to die to ensure everyone else's rescue. Meanwhile, Jack formulates a plan to combat the Others when they arrive the next day, but complications arise. This episode is notably unusual as it features a non-centric Others flashback scene (6 hours from the present) unrelated to Charlie.

Flashback: Charlie recalls the events and times of his life that he is most proud of, hence the title, "Greatest Hits." Many of the events are widespread, ranging from his first swimming lesson with his father, saving a girl from being mugged, who turns out to be Sayid's old girlfriend Nadia, receiving a ring from his brother Liam, hearing himself on the radio, and meeting Claire for the first time.

Real Time Events: Charlie learns of a new vision of Desmonds, which requires him to swim down to a new underwater hatch called "The Looking Glass" and turn of a switch will lead to the castaways being saved, and Charlies demise. Also Jack devises a plan for when the others come to raid the beach, dynamite which was secured by Danielle, will be placed in 3 tents, and will be looked upon by 3 shooters, Bernard, Sayid, and Jin.

Rating: Awful, Poor, Okay, Great, Awesome

While not much happens in this episode, we get the feel of season 1 episode, where strong acting and character development take place. Clearly this episode wants to be smooth leading up to the long-awaited finale.

Lost season finale leaked!

A source knows as "lostfan108" has apparently breached abc security, and in the midsts has gotten ahold of the scipts for the last two episodes of season 3. lostfan108 had sent out his story to various website, one being the uber geeky and exciting site "aintitcoolnews.com". That site has taken down there story on the finale which leads me to believe what has been leaked is ultimately true. A blog entitled DarkUFO has also received much of the information, as the blog is dedicated to all LOST info, including episode spoilers, and rumors. There has been much controvery leaked onto a LOST internet community who are eager to call this spoiler as it is , or claim it as a huge hoax, and what some may call it, a "FOLIER" (fake spoiler). I guess time can only tell, writers Damon Lindeloff and Carlton Cuse have spoken all season about the finale will include a massive game-changer that will stun all of the audience that the hit show has produced since 2004.

Most notably, the "game-changer" is included in lostfan108's spoiler of the finale, as he also includes more information about various important topics. I will post them below this, but DO NOT READ IF YOU DO WANT TO SPOILED. At this time, I am 80% certain that these rumors and speculation will turn out correct. I must note that while much of what I am about to post should and probably will happen, lostfan108 wasnt clear on explaining and examining the whole episode, his mission was clearly to spoil all of the very important things. SO DO NOT READ ANY FURTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!









Spoilers.....
-Lost sees visions of Walt!, yes Walt will return to save John Locke from the burial put, and advise him on killing Naomi. We will see if this is true

-5 supposed deaths will occur
1. Naomi
2. Mikael(0ther)
3. Charlie
4. Tom(other)
5. Pryce(other)

-Major confrontation will occur between John Locke and Jack/ Losties will split into 2 groups, each group being led by Locke or Jack .

-Major Spoiler and the "game-changer"
-Since the episode will entail Jack's flashback, we will see a much darker side to him, heavy drinking, suicidal thoughts, medication, a much more depressed Jack to say the least.

-He will be trying to reach someone through his flashbacks, someone very close to him, also he will attend a funeral for someone who has deeply effected his life. Near the end or at the end of the flashback, the person he has been trying to reach turns out to be none other than KATE AUSTIN, he tells her they much go back to the Island, she supposedly drives away, and the flashback we have been shown the whole episode turns out to be a flash-forward!!!!!!!!

-Well there it is folks, lost fans will be bickering back and forth over this supposed game-changer for months after the season is over, is the right move for the show? We will see, as Lindeloff clearly changes gears here with this move. I must say again, that much more stuff happens in the finale, and hopefully, HOPEFULLY, all of this is a giant hoax...... tune in May 23, at 9pm for the finale on ABC!

Weakest part of trilogy fizzles throughout

“Spiderman 3”
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Thomas Haden Church, Bryce Dallas Howard, Topher Grace, J.K. Simmons
2.5 stars out of 4


Sam Raimi has crafted two of the best comic book movies in the previous sequels to “Spiderman 3.” With this blockbuster brewing and brewing since the end of part 2, spidey fans and movie-goers have been craving this third part, hoping it would surpass the superb quality and writing of the 2nd installment. This fails on all parts , its weak in writing, also filled with many clichés’ and stuffed with a 20 minutes too long run time, and many characters.

Tobey Maguire has grown as an actor in the past, but looks like he isn’t having the usual fun he portrays with this character, he seems bored, and the audience notices it. Not only that but Kirsten Dunst sung twice in the movie, not a good idea. Along with Parker looking to advance his relationship with MJ, he has more villains, problems, and an underwhelming black suit to deal with.

The character of the Sandman (Church) is a convict on the run before he actually falls into a fusion experiment that turns him into a sand monster. Yes, it’s that unconvincing and goofy, the script throws in the fact that he’s a good guy and he just needs money to save his daughter from sickness. Topher Grace plays the rival photographer of Peter Parker, his character Eddie Brock dates the gorgeous but irrelevant Gwen Stacy (Howard) who was also in the Village. I didn’t mind Brock’s character, but as he soon as he turned into Venom, I didn’t buy his creepiness.

The film has many flaws, one being the copout of Harry Osborne getting amnesia and forgetting his plot to avenge his fathers’ death against Spiderman. James Franco plays him with pure innocence when under amnesia, Osborne is not this nice. We get the routine whiny scenes from MJ after she gets fired from her Broadway acting gig, who seeks support from Peter who is too busy relishing the fact that New York loves Spiderman.

By the end of the movie, I felt tired, un-satisfied, and kind of mad. The story has come so far since the original Spiderman, and we are given this underdeveloped mess that runs over 2 and half hours. The set designs and special effects are all top notch, but they obviously can’t save this movie. Yes the acting is alright, and we get some laughs from J.K Simmons, who plays Peter’s boss, but there isn’t enough substance in this overblown production. Although Raimi throws everything at the audience, that shouldn’t make a movie, I cared less about the characters the third time around, which made the first two installments so enjoyable.

While Maguire has said that he will not return for a 4th, it’s probably a good decision. This movie will make millions and millions, but the fact shouldn’t be hidden that Raimi tried to hard to make this special. O well, I’m already looking forward to Batman next summer.

Decent buddy film that could have been great

“Reign Over Me”
Starring: Adam Sandler, Don Cheadle, Liv Tyler, Jada Pinkett Smith, Donald Sutherland, Saffron Burrows
3 stars out of 4


Mike Binder uses a handheld camera, a refreshed but still wounded New York as his setting, and a great cast to create a film that knows what it wants to do, but has a very hard time doing it. “Reign over me” is actually a fine film until certain plot points take place, it stands on its own as buddy comedy, a serious drama, and basically as a nice piece of filmmaking that isn’t based of a comic book, or any of the usual releases in the recent months.


The story gears around two buddies who re-connect well into there lives; one of them is Alan Johnson (Cheadle) who has a loving family and his own dentist practice. He seems like a man pleasured by the simple things in life like an affectionate wife and two children. Johnson seems to be needed some extra breathing room to fulfill hobbies and just to get away for a couple of hours from routine home life. He runs into his college roommate Charlie Fineman (Sandler) who he went to dental school with. Charlie rides on a scooter around town at all hours and hasn’t the faintest idea who Alan is. The story follows them re-connecting, enjoying old music, going to Mel Brooks’ marathons, and playing a video game that Charlie is way into.


The scenes in which they are involved are subtle at times and we can see these two share chemistry. All is well and both men are re-opening themselves and having fun until Alan brings up Charles’s family who died in one of the planes in 9/11. Charlie has repressed all memories of his family and wishes to not even remember them, or acknowledge their existence at a time. This is a problem for both the men who wish to help each other. Alan enjoys spending countless hours squandering the city and getting lost in conversations but realizes at the end of the day that Charlie is hurting. Charlie enjoys Alan’s company as his only friend and after one blowup at Alan’s office; Charlie is so embarrassed by his actions that he offers Charlie a million dollars of his government insurance from his family’s death.

Most of the acting is good, as Jada Pinkett Smith turns in a nice role as Alan’s wife; Liv Tyler plays a psychiatrist looking to break into Charlie’s troubles. There is also a small subplot involving one of Johnson’s patients, played by the beautiful Saffron Burrows who just got out of her marriage and is looking for more than a friendship role in Alan’s life, as she consistently offers him oral sex.

After some of the feel good moments during the first half of the movie, and the strong acting, Sandlers character begins to feel forced, and eventually spins out of control at certain times. Many aren’t used to seeing Sandler in a serious role, he proves again here he can handle the weight, but he will never top his dramatic turn in “Punch Drunk Love.”
“Reign over Me” is a consistent look into the daily lives of several New Yorkers, some with more troubles than the next, I liked it for its convincing dialogue and for the honest scenes with Cheadle and Sandler, I wanted to like the film a lot more, but in the end it just ends up being a decent movie that needed more of a push, and less of that Sandler character that breaks everything and screams.

The audience is supposed to care so much for Charlie’s habit of avoiding his past, and shutting off certain parts of his life and memory that we eventually end up caring more about Alan’s troubles, although not at serious as Charlie’s, they feel more refreshing and grounded. By the end we don’t know whether Charlie will turn out alright, although things seem headed in the right direction, his character is so off key that anything could happen.

Violent as it is breathtaking

“300”
Starring: Gerard Butler, David Wenham, Dominic West, Rodrigo Santoro
3 stars out of 4


“300” is a violent and testosterone filled digitally enhanced sword and sandel epic from the creator of “Sin City” and director Zack Snyder. While some harsh critics will dismiss it as another notch on the adaptation of graphic novels list, I will embrace it as doing what its does best, entertain. All the sets are glistened in spectacular CGI, much of the same that was used in “Sin City.”

This film puts Gerard Butler on the verge of breaking out in Hollywood, and in film period. His powerful and demanding role of King Leonidas shall put him on the map and garner future work for him. In 480 BC, the Persian king Xerxes (Santoro) sends his massive army to conquer Greece. The Greek city of Sparta houses its finest warriors, and 300 of these soldiers are chosen to meet the Persians at Thermopylae, engaging the soldiers in a narrow canyon where they cannot take full advantage of their numbers. The battle is a suicide mission, meant to buy time for the rest of the Greek forces to prepare for the invasion. However, that doesn't stop the Spartans from throwing their hearts into the fray, determined to take as many Persians as possible with them.

The film soars in each battle scene, no matter how many be-headings we have seen before, or spears thrown through bodies, “300” makes every one feel brand new to its audience. The CGI is used so brilliantly in this kind of story, “300” is a ferocious epic soaked in blood over and over again. While some may compare it to “Troy” and epics of that sort, “300” has a fierce tempo and heart that rages through each scene and adrenaline filled speech made by Butler’s Leonidas. This type of cinema is by means groundbreaking, as “Sin City” has come before it and established a mark of its own, but “300” packs on the intensity, raw emotion of battle, and the fight for glory as these Spartans are down to there last breath in each scene. Although the dialogue could have been sharper, it’s damn entertaining to watch these built men pile on the violence when faced with adversity.

Some may comment that the film has homophobic and racial themes, but I recommend just taking every setting, display, and scene in. Although I admire “Sin City” more for its groundbreaking ambition and scope, “300” is a well spent $8 for any man looking for a jolt of violent eye candy.

Pan's Labyrinth

Review coming soon...!!!!!

"Babel"

“Babel”
Starring: Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Gael Garcia Bernal, Rinko Kikuchi, Koji Yajusho
4 stars out of 4



2006 has been met with a great wave of welcomes from a trio of talented Mexican directors, all three of there have films have swept nationwide critics emotionally, as the 3 films rank in top 10 lists of 2006 on most people’s mind.

One of those films is “Babel”, which is a multi-cultural examination of 4 different stories in 4 different countries; all bind together from one sole event. Directed with precise detail, and on an epic global scale, “Babel” has a lot to say about itself, but more importantly, about the world. Many people have called it another “Crash”, it’s not only a different film then “Crash”, but it is harder to examine, and harder to watch. I say harder to watch only because of the pain, and the difficult situations that the characters go through in the film. “Babel” tells of 4 stories, one involving Pitt’s character Richard, and his wife Susan on vacation in Morocco. They are struggling to communicate much these days, as they both mourn the loss of a child. When on a tour bus, Blanchett is struck by a bullet that hits her in the neck; Richard stops the bus and immediately is asking where medical attention can be arranged for her wound. They find a small village, and in that village is where there part of the story is told.

The bullet came from 2 children playing the hills, while they were supposed to be shooting jackals that attacked there sheep. The boys are young and aren’t sure what the consequences will bring. The gun was sold to there father, who is unknowing that his kids have shot an American tourist. Immediately it’s thought of as a terrorist attack by the tourists, and the U.S. embassy, who Richard reaches during the movie.

Next we have Richards kids at home in San Diego, where they are watched over by Amelia, there longtime Mexican nanny. Amelia has plans to get to Mexico for one day to be present at her son’s wedding. Not only can she look for a sitter for the kids, but her alcoholic nephew is going to drive her and the kids into Mexico for this event. The nephew played well by Gael Garcia Bernal.

Then in my opinion the most effective storyline, which some critics felt should have been left out of the story. In Japan we have a deaf mute teenager dealing with her mother’s death, her father has neglected her. She is at the age of sexual tension among her peers and friends. The girl named Chieko, played exquisitely by the young actress Rinko Kikuchi, wants badly to experience sex, and maybe gain someone who cares for her in that process. She presents herself sexually to any guy around her, but they turn her away because she is deaf-mute, or because she presents herself in desperate, inappropriate ways. This storyline was shot the best, a lot of colors, and music.

I do not want to give to much away about the storylines, only to say that the Japan segment obviously does connect with the other 3, but it plays itself out with Chieko so much, that we feel like were watching a different film when her story is on screen. This isn’t true, if you watch closely, you can obviously feel and pick up on her story playing into a larger global scale problem, which if course does tie in with the other 3 segments.

In this film, what can do wrong, usually will go wrong. Some critics say the film is simply not plausible, I tend to disagree, unlike “Crash”, there are less coincidences and characters to make this that kind of film. Although there are 4 stories they are weaved together brilliantly, to make all seem real. If you are familiar with the director of “Babel”, that man being Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, then you know his films aren’t upbeat and full of hope. His films tell of pain, loss, internal suffering and struggle. I have heard of some people saying this film says that America, or people in general aren’t good people. Not true, Gonzalez is simply telling a story in which several people are involved, but they never are on the screen together. The film is endlessly brilliant, dense, and telling of what the world has become. Communication sometimes is less important to people, which causes struggler and confrontation. That is one of the film’s central themes, along with many other ones.

I have only seen the movie once, but I cannot wait to purchase it, or maybe see it again if it’s re-released just before Oscar time. I know few people who would appreciate the film, simply because it’s in 6 different languages, shot in exotic and foreign locations, and that turns the average movie fan off.

“Babel” certainly isn’t for all, and that’s alright, it’s extremely hard to watch, because of the struggling and isolation of the characters, we sometimes don’t agree with there choices, but we feel there pain when they’re expectations aren’t meant. Gonzalez’ films always deal with themes, weather love, loss, and tragedy, whatever it may be. “Babel” mainly deals with the relationships between parents and there children, the way we look to shield, and protect them. The film is always brilliant, and always asking to listen.

top 10 of 2006

10.

"Borat"

Sasha Baron Cohen has used his mockumentary film as a springboard for one of the funniest films I have ever witnessed. The movie although not quite serious, presents a drastic statement about America. Cohen is all but shy about exploting our culture in this extremely halarious film.(1 Viewing)

9.

"Half Nelson"

For God sakes I had to catch this small indie in Chicago of all places, glad that expierience took place. Ryan Gosling shines in his role of a History teacher, who is also a drug abuser. Gosling transforms his actions and movements into Dan Dunne, a character who dares us to like him, but begs us to feel sorry for him. Although Gosling is superb, the film is also shared by another brilliant performance, by youngster Shareeka Epps, who knows of Dunne's actions, but remains quite fond of him, as his student. A subtle relationship is shared, the film proves a strong script and solid acting can turn an indie into gold. (1 Viewing)

8.

"Blood Diamond"

Edward Zwick is a master craftsman when dealing with epics that have political messages. He creates another one of those here with this violent and moving take on conflict(blood) diamonds in the Sierra Leone' in the early 90's. Leonardo DiCaprio plays smuggler and schemer Danny Archer in a cunning performance. Djimon Hounsou is startling as a raging father searching for his stolent son, who has been transformed by the ruling gangs of Leone to kill at will. Also starring the lovely Jennifer Connelly, as a relentless reporter. Although "Blood Diamond" mixes violence and political messages all to often, it doesn't shy away from what it wants to say, which makes it brave, good acting helps also. (1 Viewing)

7.

"Apocalypto"

Mel Gibson is a great director period! This film from start to finish was made with precise and extreme precision. Gibson more than anyone, can build a culture on screen and fill it with his own little subtleties and truths. The films works well as a culture under the microscope, and also as a violent and blood soaked chase film, that is consistently shot well. With unknown actors, and spoken all in Mayan with subtitles Gibson creates a hidden world, that comes to an end in front of our eyes. (1 Viewing)

6.

"The Prestige"

Let's just say this movie mind fucked me for 2 hours. Christopher Nolan who is known for "Memento", and "Batman Begins" made this film for sheer entertainment values. It's extremely trippy with good performances from Christian Bale, Hugh Jackman, and Michael Caine, also look for David Bowie in a small but important role. The movie takes places in the turn of the century, Bale and Jackman are rival magicians trying to make a name for one another, all the while trying to attack each other's acts due to a personal tragedy one of the men went through in the past. The film asks us to "watch closely" throughout, all of the entertainment takes your eyes off of the real trick at the end that blew my mind. (2 Viewings)

5.

"Children of Men"

Wow, I dont know where to start discussing this one, a completely ambitious and noteworthy film. Alfonso Cuaron, a visionary with a passion for being behind the camera. He directs Clive Owen in this futristic cautionary tale set in London. Infertility has taken full effect on the world, while Britain mourns over the loss of the youngest human being of 18 years, Clive Owen is sent on a mission. He must transport a pregnant black woman named Kee (key to the future) to the "Human Project" a so called group of scientists working towards bettering our society and discovering why infertility has taken place. Julianne Moore places Julian, her group of "fishes" rebels, or freedom fighters, summon Theo (Owen) for this task. He must travel through war ridden territories to get Kee to safety. The film is dark and bleak as it is brave and powerful. Clive Owen is a man who has expierienced pain and wants to help Kee badly. Also strong performances by Michael Caine as Jasper, the pot smoking comic relief of this dark drama, who in my eyes should be nominated for supporting actor. The film is extremely brilliant in it's vision of the future, also showing a dark side of humanity, as refugees are held captive in cages, ala Holocaust. "Children of Men" is an essential viewing for any film fan. (3 Viewings)

4.

"United 93" -"World Trade Center"

Both films are equally powerful in telling there own seperate stories about the most horrific day the US has ever dealt with. Paul Greengrass (93) and Oliver Stone (WTC) use there movies as storytelling, not political messages that hint agendas as us. They supply there answers through what the characters know in these 2 films. "United 93" is the story of the doomed passengers on that lonely flight who fough back in the face of adversity. "World Trade Center" focuses on two Port Authority cops who were buried under the endless rubble of the first tower that fell that day, and there journey towards survival. Both films rang true to me in light of there emotional and power and force, although many thought these films were rushed to make profits, both hold there own. Weighing in on this subject must have been rough to face, but these directors bring there talents onboard, not only to tell important stories of courage and hope, but to ultimately shed light on these events. "United 93" (2 Viewings) "WTC" (1 Viewing)

3.

"Little Children"

The most under-viewed film of 2006, telling adult tales of immaturity, and childness. Todd Field is brilliant in dealing with films all about dialogue and acting. This is one of those films, after reading the book in 2 days, I couldn't wait for the film. I had to watch it on the internet, which proves a theatre viewing could make it even more effective. Kate Winslet and Patrick Wilson play 2 stay at home parents that attract to one another. There spouses are too busy to realize there boredom with life. Winslet's Sarah and Wilson's Brad crave excitement and lust. They are the little children, even though the film is filled with really young kids being used as excuses to see one another. Great performances turn this movie about a long summer in suburbia into a funny, moving, and truthful examination about married life, sex offenders, and adult angst, to recapture a past that flew by in a second. Jackie Earle Haley plays Ronald McCorvey, the local sex offender who now lives with him mom. We feel bad for him as he is dangerous as he is innocent in a way. We never know what his next move will be. The acting in this is extraordinary, it moves the story along with ease, when nothing much at some points is happening. Jennifer Connelly also is good in a supporting role, as is Noah Emmerich who badgers McCorvey the whole film. Todd Field who has done "In the Bedroom" knows how to make us care for these foolish characters in this tale of regret, envy, and suburbia boredom.

( 1 Viewing)

2.

"Babel"

"Babel" is an international , multi-cultural puzzle of a movie that is devastating to watch, as it is to think about, and would even be worse to expierience. This was my most anticipated film before it came out, I saw it and immediately didn't fall in love with it, I admit, it's not easy to watch and take in. We follow 4 stories of parents and there children in Morocco, Tunisia, Mexico, and Japan. Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett plays a struggling married couple on vacation. We see 2 young children who are supposed to be protecting there fathers flock, but instead are toying around with his gun, when testing the gun, they shoot Pitt and Blanchett's bus, hitting Blanchett in the shoulder. All of this along with the couples children and there nanny's journey in the desert, along with a deaf-mute female in Japan's story of isolation all tie together to wield a powerful story of chance, coincidence, and tragedy. This sounds like "Crash" but I can assure you, it posesses it's own original feel. The films has it's messages about tragedy, and pain. This is the final film in the trilogy of director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu and screenwriter Guilermo Arriaga who also made "Amores Perros" and "21 Grams." I MUST see this a few more times to fully digest it's themes and mesages. I admire it's bravery in stortelling and realistic situations. The score is also brilliant, as is the last scene which haunted me afterwards. Rinko Kikuchi is brillant as the deaf-mute teenager! (1 Viewing)

1.

"The Departed"

My #1 film of 2006 is "The Departed" the violent saga involving cops and criminals was powerful, funny, violent, entertaining, and mind-blowing. This could be the year Martin Scorsese gets his Oscar. This all star cast includes Jack Nicholson, Leonardo Dicaprio, Matt Damon, Martin Sheen, Mark Whalberg, Alec Baldwin, Anthony Anderson, and Vera Farminga. To tell anything more would be spoiling the film, I will only say that Scorsese is consistenly brilliant in his portrayals of mobsters and there own little sick worlds. Acting is great, dialogue is clever and vicious. The violence is overwhelming, and the climax was totally suprising. An all around gem! (2 Viewings)

Honorable Mention

Inside Man

Little Miss Sunshine

The Descent

The Pursuit of Happyness

Have not seen

Pan's Labryinth

Notes on a Scandal

Dreamgirls

Letters from Iwo Jima

Flags of our Fathers

The Good Shepherd

The Last King of Scotland

(top 10 subject to change, after this viewings)

Dazzles beyond definition.

“Children of Men”
Starring: Clive Owen, Julianne Moore, Michael Caine, Chiwetel Ejiorfor
4 stars out of 4


The year is 2027, London is war torn, illegal immigrants are being locked up, and killed. Babies haven’t been born in 18 years, the youngest human Diego Ricardo has just died, he was 18 years old. Alfonso Cuaron has a crafted a thinking man’s sci-fi film, with rare acting, and a successful storyline. Cuaron is a visionary as any director these days, having crafted “Y Tu Mama Tambien,” and “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban,” Curaron digs much deeper with this lucrative material.

The film above all is a devastating cautionary tale, filled with sadness, grief, and regret. Clive Owen plays Theo Farron, a British bureaucrat, who is a heavy drinker. Much of his grief stems from the loss of his son years back; he is separated from his ex-wife Julian, who plays a large role in freedom fighting, along with other followers. Julian and her group believe in “The Human Project”, a society who seems to have the answer for fertility. Theo has few friends, one being Jasper played by Caine, who smokes pot, and cracks jokes, while taking care of his ill wife in his hidden home in the woods. Jasper and Theo are two men are who have lost something, and can find solace in there friendship.

Theo is kidnapped by Julian and her group, as they explain they need transportation papers for a girl named Kee, Theo needs the money, and is intrigued by this favor asked by his ex-wife. Kee is black, and very pregnant, Julian has told her only to trust Theo, as he must escort her himself, as the group protecting her has other plans. It is Theo, Kee and Miriam, who must travel through war torn and ravaged London, in this bleak and dark drama. So much is always at risk, as the 3 try to reach the Human Project. Cuaron uses tricky and devastatingly real camera work to display chaos, and war throughout the film. There is a scene that doesn’t cut for around 9 minutes that is amazingly shot and told.

Don’t be fooled, this film is graphic, real, and soaked in dark tones, along with a future setting that resembles hell. This film transports you to the inevitable situations these characters go through, in hopes of a bright future for mankind. Theo and Kee connect as they can help each other, Theo has lost all hope in life, and Kee can give him that. Kee doesn’t who to trust, and knows her trusts lie in Theo and his will to protect her.

It’s fascinating how tense and real the film is, all the time we are expecting something bad, sometimes it happens, and sometimes we view the screen we a totally different perspective on life. This certain kind of filmmaking is what jumpstarts ideas with the audience and our lives, as this dangerous cautionary tale is brought to life in the realest of real ways. Cuaron and his team have shown dedication, with his camera shots, and vivid angles, this story is filled with utter and shocking moments that hit you in the stomach.

Some will say “Children of Men” doesn’t offer enough answers, or people don’t care enough for the characters to get involved. This is not the case; we are thrown into the mix pretty fast, and aren’t given time to fathom or even breathe at times. The acting is solid, Jasper provides much needed comic relief, and Owen is always shining on screen. My only trouble was that Julian Moore couldn’t have been used better, it was kind of a throw away role.

“Children of Men” may not win any Oscars, but it remains a solid film that means a lot, it’s a step forward for Hollywood. It’s brave as it is depressing, as this cruel and bleak world is fully brought to life. We feel what the characters feel, and what this world would feel is something of this sort even happened. “Children of Men” is brilliant.

Playoff Writeup....

The Dallas Cowboys of 2006 have had a rocky season, that just got even rockier, having the 2-13 Detroit Lions at home heading into the postseason, hoping to gain momentum the 9-6 Cowboys had fell on there face, rather hard. After the 39-31 loss at Texas Stadium, the 5th seeded Cowboys will head West to face off against the 9-7 Seahawks on Saturday night. I've no idea what to expect of this game, Seattle isn't as hot as they should be which is a good thing, also it seems that the Cowboys are playing better on the road this year, having won crucial games at Carolina, New York, and Atlanta, with wins at Tennessee and Arizona.

Tony Romo has FINALLY come back to earth, which could also equal the perfect time, now knowing what he needs work on a week before the big tournament. The Cowboys a month ago were looking to secure a #2 seed in the NFC, that went out the window with a key loss to New Orleans. All was still well, as we could still win the NFC East and play a first rd. home game. That idea was scratched after Philly came into Dallas on Christmas and outplayed us, taking home a 23-7 victory, and a week later, the division.

The Cowboys haven't met with Seattle this year, only last year as we led most of the game until Drew Bledsoe forced a late pass in the late 4th quarter to setup a Josh Brown game winning FG. It's been A LONG 4 years since I have expierienced a playoff matchup. The last one taking place in 2003 as the 6th seeded Cowboys faced the Superbowl losers Carolina, losing 29-10. That was Parcells' first year, the year our defense was stout as all hell, the year Quincy Carter was up and down as anyone in the league, the year we have ZERO running game. Things have changed since then, our defense is playing like paper, our offense can't find a rhythm, but one thing is definitely for sure, I would choose Tony Romo to start this game over Quincy Carter( no longer in the league) and Drew Bledsoe (benched earlier this year) Parcells has talked of improving in all aspects since the New Orleans thrashing on Monday Night several weeks ago, we have gotten worse. We have gone from good to terrible on defense dealing with 3rd downs, we have 1 pass rusher in Demarcus Ware, and our secondary, save for Terence Newman cannot cover ANYONE.. This is not a good thing when facing Seattle's Branch, Jackson, etc....

Playing on the road does not scare me, I KNOW we can hold Shaun Alexander to under 70 or 80, we have done it before, his 4 career games against total around 215 yds combined rushing in all 4. Speaking of playing Seattle, it was Julius Jones 2 years ago that ran ALL OVER them for 198 yds and 3 td's on Monday Night, well Julius we can sure use you under those lights again, as our running game has failed to get going recently. If we can attack early and get TO involved we should win this game. Also, spelling Julius with Barber III should tire the Seattle D. Hopefully I won't get let down since I haven't seen a playoff win since 1996, wow 11 years ago... Come Saturday Night, GO COWBOYS!!!!! I'll say Cowboys 24 Seahawks 20

Replenished Gibson presents the epic to end all epics

“Apocalypto”
Starring: Rudy Youngblood
4 stars out of 4


Having seen previews for “Apocalypto” months and months ago, I looked at it as another risky gamble from controversial director Mel Gibson that probably wouldn’t pan out with major audiences, or even anyone. Gibson has a gift behind the camera that few possess. He shoots in exotic locations and his costumes and set designs are beyond exceptional, that along with bold storytelling make “Apocalypto,” one of this year’s best.

As the Maya kingdom faces its decline, the rulers insist the key to prosperity is to build more temples and offer human sacrifices. Jaguar Paw (Rudy Youngblood), a young man chosen for sacrifice, flees the kingdom to avoid his fate. Leaving his son and pregnant wife behind, Jaguar knows he must escape his captors and return to his family. Although the film is completely in Mayan, the English subtitles have no distractions towards the film.

Gibson is so talented with his original and lost material, I have honestly never set a glance on the images and moments Gibson creates in this epic story of survival. He places his main character Jaguar in so much danger and near death that the audience is always gasping during his fleeing scene, which is the whole 2nd half of the movie. The first half is all leading up to it, the civilization is crumbling, and more are needed to be sacrificed. When you watch the film, you will constantly become baffled at how they shot some of the scenes, and how much research had gone into this, although it won’t garner any acting nominations, it should be a lock for makeup, cinematography, and costume design. Since the competition will be rather stiff for foreign language film, and Gibson’s stagnant reputation, the academy could shy away from the film altogether.

If there were any negative aspects of the film, I’d say the dialogue could have been tweaked, and the lack of a larger storyline, although what was in front of me was ambitious and non-stop great filmmaking. Mel Gibson should really consider staying out of the public eye, and focus on being behind the camera more, when he is, he makes outstanding, and thought provoking material. For its braveness and pure heart, “Apocalpyto,” is a very straightforward film about the beginning of the end, and what is to come afterwards. I was thrilled for 2 and half hours

An extremely satisfying 138 minutes

“Little Children”
Starring: Kate Winslet, Jennifer Connelly, Patrick Wilson, Noah Emmerich, and Jackie Earle Haley.
4 stars out of 4


I wouldn’t even know where to start describing and dissecting “Little Children.” A film so rare and true to it’s nature, that I would be shocked if I didn’t gather several Oscar nominations. New Line has failed to market the film appropriately, and that will serve as its downfall come award season, unless it gets a late push come December.
Todd Field is a master crafter; he knows the ins and outs of the settings that he paints. Field’s last effort “In the Bedroom” was he debut film, it garnered many nominations, and it’s stood on its own as one of the best finds of 2001. Field, who has been away from the big-screen, returns swiftly as we come to notice fast that only he could create a film with so many haunting, but yet true and bold undertones.

The film takes place over a very long summer, we are always sitting in on conversations at the playground, or the local pool, Field creates such innocence, and as much guilt at the same time. Winslet plays Sarah Pierce, whose young daughter Lucy doesn’t get as much attention as she should at her age, Sarah has a PhD in English literature, but never finished her dissertation. She is now a stay at home mom, while her husband Richard is off at work all day, or is he? Sarah and Richard are never really on speaking terms, mainly after Sarah catches him sniffing the panties of an online woman who likes to be called by all of her fans, or net perverts, “Slutty” Kay. Sarah dulls around all day long, taking Lucy to the playground and sitting with the other mothers, who fantasize about Brad (Wilson) who they call the “Prom King”, due to him being so dreamy, and of course, them not knowing his name. Brad is marred to Kathy (Connelly) who is a PBS type documentary-film maker, while she isn’t at work she protects and loves there young son Aaron, who Brad entertains all day with Kathy is at work.
Brad has failed the bar-exam twice, and is constantly pressed by Kathy to attempt a third try. When he is pretending to go to classes, Brad watches the local young kids skate around, a young life Brad still obsesses about, no responsibility or commitment.

Meanwhile a local pedophile has just moved back into town with his mother, Ronnie McCorvey, played to a haunting tee by Earle Haley, is one of the many characters we feel bad for, he is also the only one who is grown up and faces reality, unlike Sarah and Brad who aren’t doers. The town hates the idea of McCorvey roaming around amongst the many children, one particular man who hates this is former cop Larry Hedges (Emmerich), since he got kicked of the force for mistakenly shooting a black kid, Larry has arranged a late night touch football team. Larry introduces Brad to this, and also to the pleasures that he gets from damaging McCorvey’s property, and making sure everyone knows this man lives amongst them.

The film is so complicated as these characters come to grip with there needs, there pleasures, and there regrets. Field is truly crafty in the way he presents equal screen time to everyone, but mostly Sarah and Brad, who share an intimate and truthful affair over the summer. Neither realizes the consequences that might arise, but they feel comfortable and safe with each other, recognizing one another needs at all times. They are happy together, but will it last?

Todd Field’s sophomore effort takes the closest look at modern suburbia since “American Beauty” and asks some pretty tough questions. I try to think of weaknesses of the film, but I draw a blank, although the ending was realistic, I wanted a little more. Other than that “Little Children” proves that acting, dialogue, and characters on the edge can truly form a stellar movie. Although I had to watch the film on my computer, I look forward to watching it again, and hopefully it comes to a local theatre to capture all of the cinematic effects. The film also has a narrator, that doesn’t hand feed us what is happening, but simply adds another touch to the characters thoughts and flaws. Wow do these characters have flaws, but I’ve never cared for, or identified with them more in my life. Keep it up Todd Field; you have made two great films.

Oscar Predictions

Best Picture
-Babel- Needs support from the supporting categories to be a for sure nod (4/4)
-The Departed-Pretty much a lock for a nomination (4/4)
-Dreamgirls-A lock for a nomination, also the supposed frontrunner (not seen yet)
-Little Miss Sunshine- Breakthrough of the year, (3.5/4)
-The Queen-This is Capote of last year, will garner a best directing nod, and will win best actress(3.5/4)
Darkhorses-Children of Men, Blood Diamond, Little Children, Flags of our Fathers, the Good Shepherd

Best Director
-Martin Scorsese(The Departed)-A lock for a nom., has missed out on the gold his previous 4 noms.
-Clint Eastwood(Flags of our Fathers)-Looks to be a nom, although his film could miss out on best pic nomination
-Stephen Frears(The Queen)-Will get a nomination
-Alejandro Gonzalez Inarittu(Babel)-This will be close, academy voters like voting for foreign directors, and how could you not with how good this film is
-Bill Condon(Dreamgirls)-Lock for a nomination

Best Actor
-Ryan Gosling(Half-Nelson) Breakthrough performance, small indie with a lot of heart
-Will Smith(Pursuit of Happyness) This will probably be the film's only nomination
-Peter O Toole(Venus) Due for an Oscar
-Forest Whitaker(The Last King of Scotland) Voters have placed him in this category, it's probably his race to lose
-Leonardo Dicaprio(The Departed or Blood Diamond) Strong acting in both films will give Leo a nod.

Best Actress
-Helen Mirren(The Queen) Lock for a nom, probably lock for a win
-Kate Winslet(Little Children) New Line better start pushing this film hard, it's getting raves, but no one has seen it
-Judi Dench(Notes on a Scandal) Seems fair
-Meryl Streep(The Devil Wears Prada) Weak year, and good performance
-Penelope Cruz (Volver) Voters love those foreign performances with heart
Darkhorses-Beyonce Knowles(Dreamgirls)

Best Supporting Actor
-Jack Nicholson(The Departed) Jack is a lock for a nod.
-Jackie Earle Haley(Little Children) Said to be one of the best performances this year, again not many have seen this movie, will need a wider release to expose this performance, and the film itself.
-Michael Sheen(The Queen) A safe bet
-Eddie Murphy(Dreamgirls) Said to have been his best performance ever, will he attract voters?
-Adam Beach(Flags of our Fathers)Not sure here, but could get a nod.
Darkhorses-Ben Affleck(Hollywoodland) Alan Arkin(Little Miss Sunshine) Brad Pitt(Babel)

Best Supporting Actress
-Abigail Breslin(Little Miss Sunshine)-Youngster could get a nod.
-Jennifer Hudson(Dreamgirls) Frontrunner
-Rinko Kikuchi(Babel) Praying she get's noticed for this heartbreaking performance
-Cate Blanchett (Notes on a Scandal)Seems like a safe bet
-Adrianna Barazza(Babel) Yes, 2 Babel stars could get nods.
Darkhorses-Demi Moore, Sharon Stone(Bobby) Sandra Bullock(Infamous)

This movie fuckin rocked!

“The Departed”
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Matt Damon, Jack Nicholson, Mark Whalberg, Martin Sheen, Vera Farmiga, Anthony Anderson, Alec Baldwin
4 stars out of 4


O Marty Marty, wow have you returned with some spectacular stuff! I can’t believe how good this movie was. From Jack’s opening monologue, to the dialog, to the acting, to the bloody shootouts, this is movie going at its finest. We know from the beginning that this isn’t going to be a pretty story, there will be betraying, killing, and fuck said about 150 times.

Although this is Scorsese’ film, he has turned it into a remake of the Hong Kong film “Internal Affairs.” Not only is the material top notch, Scorsese has gathered a cast of A-listers to fill out this masterpiece. The story while simple to explain gets even trickier and more dangerous for the characters as the film moves on, ferociously clocking in at 152 minutes, it gives all the time in the world to the characters to plan, counter plan, and make there moves.

Leonardo DiCaprio is a stunning actor, full of charisma and charm, he can play probably anything, here he plays Billy Costigan, a kid who has been surrounded by a family of crime his whole life. He, along with Matt Damon, who plays Colin Sullivan, are both training to be policeman for the Massachusetts staties. Nicholson who isn’t as cuddly this time around, does his first Scorsese film, you would think he had done a dozen previous to this for how good he is in it. Nicholson plays Frank Costello, the kingpin of Boston, the “it” when it comes to organized crime. The staties have been on his trail forever and plan to get even closer if they Costigan in as mole in Costello’s crime outfit. Only Mark Whalberg and Martin Sheen mind you, know the identity of Costigan, as they faked kicking him off the force, as he took a bumb prison sentence to make sure he looks more like a criminal. Costello takes him in slowly, trusting him, as Costigan is scared for his life the whole time.

Matt Damon and Leonardo can be called the same actor, they both have turned down the same roles, one has declined a role, the other has accepted. These two are as close as your gonna get to charming A-listers these days. They are so talented and believable, they make this story so dangerous and exciting that you would think these were they’re real jobs. As Damon takes the part as a member of Costello’s crew who gets in the Staties and may even climb into better positions. Two moles are planted; let the games begin Scorsese style, which means violence, swearing, great music, gangster appeal, this film flat out makes you want to shoot somebody in the head.

Rounding out the solid supporting cast is Alec Baldwin, head of the team trying to get to Costello, Anthony Anderson, a fellow cop, and Vera Farmiga who comes across as very sexy in a breakout role as Sullivan’s girlfriend who doesn’t know his real identity, but who also shares some intimate moments with Costigan as she is a psych inside the department.

This movie is as old school as it gets, the writing is spectacular, and you get the feel of true, down to the bone vintage Scorsese. The cast even knows it, I can’t even imagine how much fun they had shooting this movie. It’s so fun watching Damon and DiCaprio play cat and mouse. The 152 minutes felt like an hour and half. Although some may shy away from the hard on machismo displayed in almost every shot, the film relies on it, as these characters thrive on what they know best, either being a cop, or being a gangster.

Nicholson hasn’t had this much fun in years, as he could be a Best Supporting Actor contender come Oscar time. Jack plays such a wily guy, that while still dangerous we can't avoid his persistence as the nucleus of the film, yes he's getting old, but he remains the best at what he does. I still can’t stop thinking of DiCaprio’s performance, he is so convincing and hard nosed, who could have seen the heartthrob from “Titanic” doing this kind of work? Not I.


This film is balanced incredibly, everyone is given sufficient screen time, what a shame it would’ve been if you couldn’t get these A-listers enough time to develop in a story like this. So much is on the line in every scene, so much at risk for these characters. You can tell how devoted they are to this stuff, trusting Martin(Scorsese) was never an issue. He is back ladies and gentleman, after “Gangs of New York” and “The Aviator” the Marty that everyone loves had made his mark, this is the best film of the year so far, and a true crime masterpiece.

Thoughts days before Dallas v Philly

The game is approaching, and I hope that we are leading late into the game. As it darkens outside of Lincoln Financial Field, I hope all Dallas fans around the world are eagerly awaiting our 3-1 record, with increasingly exciting thoughts of the Houston Texans visiting us the week after. I picture many outcomes after around 7 p.m on Sunday. I picture the Eagles out in front most of the game, as we struggle to find a spark on offense, or even on defense. I picture us receiving the ball first, the crowd craving a hard hit on Owens when he is called for a slant towards Brian Dawkins' territory. I picture that drive molding the whole season, as we start from our own 25 and tire the clock down to 7 minutes remaining in the first quarter. The drive hopefully will consist of us converting a key 3rd down in our own territory, silencing the crowd for a moment. Then, when we actually get down to business and past all of the T.O. hoopla, he breaks Philly's back in the red zone, scoring on a 17 yd fade. All would be well until Donovan answered quickly, using all of his weapons in a fast-paced drive putting 6 on the board.

I imagine so many things come Sunday at 4... Can we hang with these Eagles? Will T.O. disrupt our gameplan and cause Philly to outplay, and if possible outcoach us? This without a doubt, would be a gigantic achievment, I really don't expect us to win this game, I expect us to fight, to hang, but not to win.

Some Keys.... Can we get enough pressure on McNabb that he will force throws? Can our offensive line hold up against Jim Johnson's schemes that will put everlasting pressure on the immobile Bledsoe? Can Julius and M.Barber combine for a well earned 150 on the ground? Can Witten caught 5 or 6 key balls for 70? Can Glenn breakthrough out of T.O's spotlight and break Philly's back with a 55 yd score late in the game? Can T.O. do a well respected thing, can he catch 7 balls for 124 and maybe a TD that means something?

Please Dallas, come into Philly and throw it all out there, please! I don't want to lose 27-17 like I think we will... Please Mike Vanderjagt if the game is in your hands, come through, this game more than anything will overcome your Pittsburgh letdown lastyear, if you hit the game winner in a hostile game on the road. Parcells, don't be too conservative with the playcalling, let Drew go deep a few times to keep Philly DB's honest... Please Dallas, secure this one in any fashion, sloppy, clean, close, or blowout, it DOESNT MATTER!, just get the W!!!... Let's be 3-1, have control of the divison, and come home to face the Texans the week after... Please...Please!!!!!!